Donation and Procurement Posters

Tuesday July 03, 2018 from 16:30 to 17:30

Room: Hall 10 - Exhibition

P.598 PDSA cycles show improvements in key indicators in deceased donation: The Spanish experience

Abstract

PDSA Cycles Show Improvements in Key Indicators in Deceased Donation: The Spanish Experience

Christel Terron Manceau 1, Bibiana Ramos1, Teresa Pont2, Nuria Masnou3, Camino Rodriguez-Villar4, Julio Domingo Zambudio5, Jose Elizalde6, Jorge Vallejo7, Sergio Rodriguez8, Jose Maria Diaz9, Maria Amparo Bodi10, Rosario Marazuela1, Elisabeth Coll1, Beatriz Dominguez-Gil1.

1Organización Nacional de Trasplantes, MADRID, Spain; 2Hospital Universitario Vall d´Hebrón, BARCELONA, Spain; 3Hospital Universitario de Gerona Doctor Josep Trueta, GERONA, Spain; 4Hospital Clinic, BARCELONA, Spain; 5Hospital VIrgen de la Arrixaca, MURCIA, Spain; 6Complejo Hospitalario de Navarra, PAMPLONA, Spain; 7Hospital Regional de Málaga, MALAGA, Spain; 8Hospital Nuestra Señora de la Candelaria, TENERIFE, Spain; 9Hospital Virgen de la Salud, TOLEDO, Spain; 10H. U. de Tarragona Joan XXIII, TARRAGONA, Spain

ACCORD-Spain study group..

Background: The objective of ACCORD-Spain is to promote cooperation between Donor Coordinators (DC) and critical care professionals in the deceased donation process. Its specific objectives are: i) To describe the deceased donation pathway from patients dead as a result of  a devastating brain injury (possible donors); ii) To identify opportunities for improvement in the said process and implement small interventions for change using the Plan, Do, Study, Act (PDSA) methodology. We present the impact of these interventions at a national level.
Patients and Methods: The project was developed in three phases: 1. Data were collected on the deceased donation pathway from  possible donors aged 1 month-85 years in participating hospitals during 11/1/2014-4/30/2015. 2. After a dedicated training in the PDSA methodology, each center was asked to set up a working group in their hospital to analyze the local improvement opportunities and design (Plan), implement (Do) and evaluate the impact (Study) of a small intervention, to then incorporate it into their usual practice (Act). 3. To assess the impact of these interventions, data were collected on possible deceased donors in these hospitals during 11/01/15-04/30/16.
We describe the deceased donation pathway before and after the 46 PDSA cycles designed and implemented by 43 hospitals participating in the three phases of the Project.
Results:.  37 interventions focused on the identification of possible donors outside of the intensive care unit (ICU): prospective follow-up of cases identified through the systematic review of neuroimages and/or diagnoses at hospital admission, development of notification criteria, design of posters and methods for early referral, preparation of protocols on intensive care to enable organ donation, verification of compliance with the systematic referral policy, training and continuous feed-back to professionals involved. Seven hospitals focused on the initiation or  consolidation of a controlled Donation after Circulatory Death program and 2 in improvements in the family approach to discuss donation opportunities. .
Results pre and post-intervention are represented in  table 1.
Conclusions: The project reveals the existence of opportunities for improvement in the deceased donation process in our country, both in the identification of possible donors outside the ICU and in donation after circulatory death. Both areas must be subject to continuous evaluation. The PDSA methodology can facilitate the search for excellence and continuous improvement in organ donation.

Presentations by Christel Terron



© 2024 TTS2018