Kidney Posters

Monday July 02, 2018 from 16:30 to 17:30

Room: Hall 10 - Exhibition

P.097 Whole-exome sequencing identified mutational profiles of de novo urothelial carcinoma after kidney transplantation

Lee-Moay Lim, Taiwan

attending physician
Division of Nephrology
Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital

Abstract

Whole-exome Sequencing Identified Mutational Profiles of De Novo Urothelial Carcinoma after Kidney Transplantation

Lee-Moay Lim1,3, Daw-Yang Hwang 1, Wen-Yu Chung2, A-Mei Huang3,4,5, Hung-Tien Kuo1,6.

1Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan; 2Department of Computer Science and Information Engineering , National Kaohsiung University of Applied Sciences, Kaohsiung, Taiwan; 3Graduate Institute of Clinical Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan; 4Graduate Institute of Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan; 5Department of Medical Research, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan; 6Faculty of Renal Care, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan

Introduction: Urothelial carcinoma (UC) has the characteristic of high mutational burden and elevated degree of molecular heterogeneity compared with other solid tumor. Rapid development in whole exome sequencing (WES) have identified drivers and somatic alteration of UC. In Taiwan, UC is the most common de novo cancer after kidney transplantation. There are limited reports exploring the genomic alteration in UC after kidney transplantation. In this study we perform WES of UC developed after kidney transplantation in an effort to discover the molecular genetics of UC and their association with immunosuppressive regiment used.
Materials and Methods: Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded archival samples of UC from 5 kidney transplant patients from the Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital Taiwan were obtained. Kidney transplant patients with UC diagnosed before the transplant surgery were excluded. All of the patients were sporadic, without any family history of UC. For control group, we selected 5 hemodialysis patients with UC diagnosed after the commencement of dialysis treatment. The patient medical history was confirmed by chart review. DNA was extracted for WES analysis.
Results: Our WES data is matched with the Cosmic, Intogen, and TCGA database for onco-driver genes. We newly identified nine genes, including BRIP1, GNAQ, IKZF1, MLLT10, NTRK3, SEPT6, SH3GL1, SLC34A2, TSC2 which have mutations specifically in kidney transplant recipients in this study. These patients received conventional immunosuppressive agents, including Tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor (mTORi) and steroid as maintenance therapy.
Discussion and Conclusion: This preliminary data provides clues for understanding the mutational landscape of UC developed after kidney transplantation. Genetic analysis in malignancy after transplantation may help to identify high risk patients in post-transplant care and also illuminate a fundamental aspects of the molecular pathogenesis of post-transplantation UC.

Presentations by Lee-Moay Lim



© 2024 TTS2018