Acute Cellular Rejection and Polyoma (Videos Available)

Monday July 02, 2018 from 09:45 to 11:15

Room: N-102

316.2 Inflammation in scarred areas (i-IF/TA): Defining the response to standard treatment of T cell-mediated rejection in kidney recipients

Alexandre Loupy, France

Nephrologist
Department of Nephrology and Kidney Transplantation
Necker Hospital

Abstract

Inflammation in Scarred Areas (i-IF/TA): Defining the Response to Standard Treatment of T cell-mediated Rejection in Kidney Recipients

Denis Viglietti1, Olivier Aubert1, Jean-Paul Duong Van Huyen1, Alexandre Loupy1, Carmen Lefaucheur1.

1Paris Translational Research Center for Organ Transplantation, Paris, France

The last Banff meeting held in 2017 has focused on the importance of defining the potential role of i-IF/TA as a component of the T cell-mediated rejection (TCMR) process in kidney allografts. We investigated the clinical value of i-IF/TA for evaluating the response to standard treatment of TCMR in kidney recipients.

Among 1916 kidney recipients transplanted between 2004 and 2010, we prospectively included all patients with biopsy-proven acute TCMR within the first year post-transplant, who received standardized treatment by steroids pulses and rabbit anti-thymocyte globuline in refractory cases. Patients were systematically assessed at the time of diagnosis and at 3 months post-treatment for glomerular filtration rate (GFR), proteinuria, histology (including i-IF/TA Banff score) and presence of donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies (DSAs), and followed up to 2017 to assess allograft survival.

We included 172 patients with biopsy-proven acute TCMR who received standard treatment. The distribution of TCMR grades was: 52 (30%) grade IA, 65 (38%) grade IB, 37 (22%) grade IIA, 11 (6%) grade IIB and 7 (4%) grade III TCMR. After TCMR treatment, patients showed increased GFR (p<0.001), decreased proteinuria (p<0.001), interstitial inflammation (p<0.001), tubulitis (p<0.001) and intimal arteritis (p<0.001), worsening IF/TA (p<0.001) and arteriosclerosis (p<0.001). Patients with post-treatment i-IF/TA (N=89, 52%) showed decreased 10-year graft survival compared to patients without post-treatment i-IF/TA (N=83, 48%): 64% vs 89%, respectively, p<0.001. In multivariable analysis, the independent predictors of allograft loss measured at the time of post-treatment evaluation were the presence of i-IF/TA (HR=3.4, p=0.005), the presence of transplant glomerulopathy (HR=2.4, p=0.001), GFR (HR=0.97, p=0.010) and the presence of anti-HLA DSAs (HR=2.3, p=0.021). Patients with post-treatment i-IF/TA showed higher incidence of de novo anti-HLA DSAs at 1 year post-transplantation (24% vs 6%, p=0.001) and accelerated progression of IF/TA up to 1000 days after transplantation (p=0.01 in mixed-effects model) on biopsies performed at any time after transplantation (N=704) compared to patients without post-treatment i-IF/TA.

The presence of i-IF/TA after standard treatment of acute TCMR is associated with the occurrence of de novo anti-HLA DSAs, accelerated progression of interstitial fibrosis and allograft loss, and may identify patients with persisting active TCMR in whom additional therapies should be considered.



© 2024 TTS2018